Archive for the ‘Criminal Justice’ Category

Military Justice Debacle!

October 19, 2012


KSM and Maj. Hasan, both terrorists of Islam, are currently on trial.  This would be a good thing if not for some disturbing facts being ignored by the media.

  1. Obama’s administration refuses to label Hasan’s slaughter of military hero’s at Ft Hood acts of terror.  They are considered acts of work related violence. (seriously?)
  1. KSM, the master mind behind the 911 attacks, is facing a military tribunal.  The military judge allowed him to wear a military vest (American made) in the courtroom.

This absurdity taking place in our military justice system is a direct result of liberalism infecting the military after the Obama administration took charge of the military.  Does anyone seriously believe KSM and Hasan would be orchestrating their trials under a Romney administration?  Change is coming and conservative common sense will become the main stream over political correctness embraced by liberalism.


Liberal Opportunist

July 26, 2012

If Mayor Bloomberg of New York City is deserving of a title it would should be:  “Liberal Opportunist”.  Because he exceeds the norm in seizing upon issues to advance his liberal agenda for New York City.  In the past year he has declared war on fast foods, soda drink sizes, and now he is using the Colorado massacre to outlaw guns.  He just recently proposed law enforcement go on strike in protest of the fact citizens are permitted to own firearms. Basically he is politicizing, for his own purposes, a horrible massacre of Americans.  This was something he spoke out against during the 911 attacks.

Here are a few rubs with his contention firearms be prohibited to everyone but law enforcement.

1.  He already has one of the strictest firearm laws, banning them from New York City, yet gun violence continues to be a problem in NYC, just like in Chicago and Washington DC, where there are similar laws.

2.  A reasonable person would conclude;  gun control DOES NOT equate to a safer society.  It states the opposite, prohibiting firearms means only the police and criminals will have them.  Does that make for a safer society?  The statistics and recent crime reports on urban violence beg to differ with liberals who are pushing gun control on America.

Mayor Bloomberg is now  suggesting police officers should violate the law and abdicate their sworn duty to protect and serve their communities by going on strike to protest.  There are laws in every state that prohibit police officers  from striking and for good reason. They are the only line of defense we have against criminals.  For Mayor Bloomberg to suggest a strike is ridiculous and shows how full of crap liberals are with regard to policy.  Mayor Bloomberg is a Liberal Opportunist and his statements are insulting to thinking Americans.

Action Deserving of Contempt!

June 21, 2012


Attorney General Eric Holder will be held in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents they requested for their investigation on the Fast & Furious program approved by his office.  The seriousness of the issue has just been elevated  by Obama’s decision to use his executive privilege power to protect Holder and the documents Congress requested.

We now have a situation where the White House is protecting or covering up information  requested by Congress.  The question is why?  I realize the majority of Americans do not follow politics close enough to know the reason.  There must be damaging information in those documents that will both embarrass and possibly indict people  involved in the Fast & Furious program that led to a Federal Agent being killed.  As Americans we have the right to know what happened, why it happened and most important who was responsible.

President Obama’s action just created almost the exact same situation created by one of his predecessors,  Richard Nixon, back in the early 70’s.  Instead of cooperating and coming clean with the truth about Fast & Furious,  Obama chose to stone wall it by invoking executive privilege.  You must understand that House Oversight Chairman, Issa-R CA.  must already know there are documents that will incriminate high level members of Obama’s government, possibly the Attorney General himself.  So, instead of cooperation and transparency ( something Obama promised during his campaign) he has chosen to stone wall the investigation to seek the truth about Fast & Furious.

Executive Privilege is a power only the President holds to protect sensitive information given by his advisers over matters that may affect national security.  This case involves the Criminal Justice Department not the White House and has nothing to do with National Security.   Obama should release the documents now,  not later when the courts order it, which of course will come after the election.  How convenient for them!


We Are Not Racists Sam Donaldson!

June 19, 2012

Sam Donaldson accused anyone opposing Obama’s new policy (not enforcing the immigration laws pertaining to certain Mexican illegal’s) as Racist!  I am offended by those remarks and if you believe in our constitution and our nation of laws you should be offended.

We are not racists because we oppose a policy designed to ignore the constitution and is politically motivated.  What it does make us is smart, it means we are paying attention and we refuse to be silent while you undermine the law!

President Obama does NOT have the authority under the constitution to be selective about what parts of the constitution he chooses to protect and defend.  Obama took an oath and if he understands the oath. “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  He knows he is outside the scope of his power.  Obama is on record stating he took an oath to defend and preserve the constitution as a way of not acting before on the immigration issue. He said it was congress job and it was up to them to reform immigration.  He was right, and it was Democrat Harry Reid who was blocking a bill crafted by Marco Rubio to reform the immigration law.

We oppose that issue for that reason Mr. Donaldson.  That does not make us racists.   Quite frankly sir, your comments are appalling and offensive and an apology to conservative Americans, who believe in the constitution, is warranted.  Man up Mr. Donaldson.

Alcee Hastings Wants The Dead To Vote!

June 7, 2012

This photo is of U.S. Representative, Alcee Hastings. D – FL  He was impeached as a Federal Judge. In 1988, the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives took up the case, and Hastings was impeached for bribery and perjury by a vote of 413-3. He was then convicted in 1989 by the United States Senate, becoming the sixth federal judge in the history of the United States to be removed from office by the Senate. Does anyone else find it laughable the liberal left is using him as a mouth piece to oppose Gov. Scott’s initiative to remove dead people and illegals from the voting rolls?  How stupid do Liberals think we are?  Why would Democrats be opposed to clearing the voter registration rolls of people who do not have the legal right to vote or are dead?  My guess is because it has worked out so well for them in Chicago over the years!

Fair & Balanced Reporting?

March 27, 2012


Anyone remember this guy?  Over the past two weeks we have seen an onslaught of news reporting over the tragic shooting by one of our soldiers that resulted in the killing of civilians in Afghanistan.   The soldier has been arrested and is in military custody awaiting court martial.   He is being charged with murder and is facing life imprisonment.   This all occurred within a month after the shootings.   There are reports of the soldier being wounded suffering a head wound and after 2 tours of Iraq and then deployment to Afghanistan the issue of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome has to be considered.  Yet only 1 month and he is charged and facing court martial.  Why?  Political and media pressure to act swiftly all generated by the liberals.  Now consider the following:

Need proof regarding the mainstream media’s bias on reporting? Here is a good example.  After reading the headlines recently about one of our US soldiers who shot up Afghanistan civilians, I couldn’t help noticing an irony. There is all this clamor to try this guy quickly and execute him, never mind his having suffered a traumatic brain injury.

Yet this Major Hassan, who shot up Fort Hood (Americans) while screaming Allah akbar, still hasn’t stood trial, and they are still debating whether he was insane, even with the clear evidence regarding his motive: slay as many infidels as possible.  So we have a guy in a war zone who cracks, and he must be executed immediately.  But this Muslim psychiatrist who was stateside in a nice safe office all day murders 13, wounds 29 of our own guys, and they try to argue the poor lad suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome, from listening to real soldiers who had actual battle experience. Two and a half years later, they still haven’t tried him, and yet no outrage from the mainstream media! Yup, that’s fair and balanced reporting

Castle Doctrine

January 5, 2012

A young Colorado mother takes matters into her own hands to protect herself and her 3 month old baby.  After calling 911 to alert them to 2 men attempting to break into her home, she does what any person with common sense does.  She shot and killed the first guy entering her home with a shotgun.  The other intruder fled (no surprise) and was caught later.

In New York you cannot use deadly force if you know with certainty that you can avoid an intruder by retreating.  You can use deadly force if you are not the initial aggressor in an altercation within your home. (Imagine having to process that concept while facing a threat to your safety)  Today she would be under investigation and subject to both criminal and civil charges for protecting herself and her infant.  Some cities want to prevent you from owning a firearm, even in your own home.  So my question to those who support this type of nonsense; Do you really believe the police can protect you if facing the same situation in your own home?  Only those on the far left would be foolish enough to believe it!

Stop Coddling Terrorists!

November 21, 2011

NYPD arrested Jose Pimentel on various charges yesterday and called him an “Al-Qaeda” sympathizer. According to police Pimentel allegedly was plotting to bomb police and post offices in NYC, as well as U.S. troops returning home.

Does anyone remember just a few months ago when NYPD came under intense attack by the liberal media and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for targeting Muslim neighborhoods in NYC.  Seriously?  Does anyone believe Pimentel would have chosen a Jewish neighborhood to plot his terror activities? (note photograph)  When are we going to stop the police bashing when they are simply doing their jobs of protecting us and focus on stopping terrorist activity within our own borders?

I commend every member of the NYPD for the outstanding work they have been doing in discovering and preventing terrorist attacks in the largest city in America.  I condemn those of the far left who continue to work with the ACLU and other groups that support providing comfort and security to terrorists hiding within the Muslim communities in our major cities.


February 23, 2011

In (1801–1805), President Thomas Jefferson went to war, (known as the Barbary Coast War or the Tripolitan War)  the war stemmed from the Barbary pirates’ attacks upon American merchant shipping in an attempt to extort ransom for the lives of captured sailors and American passengers.  The pirates operating from Muslim countries along the northern African continent were defeated decisively as a result of Jefferson’s strong leadership by responding with military action to this pirate threat.  Today, 2011 the United States has no consistent policy towards Piracy on the high seas.  That fact is allowing  pirates in Somalia, Yemen and other rogue Muslim nations to act with impunity hijacking merchant ships and private vessels in international waters.  As a result  American lives are in peril. 

This week (4) innocent Americans were killed by pirates holding them hostage for ransom.  President Obama’s Administration (with their inept policy on piracy) contributed to the deaths of Jean and Scott Adam of Marina del Rey, along with Bob Riggle and Phyllis Macay of Seattle , innocent Americans (who ironically) were traveling in the area as missionaries sharing the bible and Christianity. 

This TRAGIC incident should look familiar to anyone paying attention to history.  President Clinton’s policies towards terrorism (which treated terrorists as criminals) only served to embolden terrorists, we know the results of that policy.  The very same thing is again happening under Obama’s administration.  There are news reports that negotiations were taking place with tribal elders over a ransom for the Americans.  Obama’s failure to provide leadership and his mixed message towards Islamic terrorism is again emboldening Islamic Terrorism.  We are beginning to see the tragic results of his failure to lead.  How many more innocent Americans will have to die before Obama gets it?

Planned Parenthood?

February 19, 2011

There is an important public debate taking place on public tax dollars going to support abortion clinics.  You won’t hear that news from the mainstream media or Huffington Post.  Planned Parenthood, (according to them) is about providing counseling and instruction to young teenage women to protect them from unplanned parenthood.  If that was true nobody would have a problem with them.  The truth is they are deeply involved in the abortion process and help create abortion clinics like the one in Philadelphia run by a monster with a medical license!

Planned Parenthood is making a business out of aborting babies from young poor women!  To some that is no big deal, but to the majority of Christian Americans, it is a huge deal  made worse over the fact it is happening with your tax dollars!  That is supposed to be against Federal law.  So how is it happening?

Planned Parenthood is supported by far left liberals who under Nancy Pelosi’s control found deceptive ways to fund it.  Today, (following an investigation that exposed the business practices of Planned Parenthood) it is under the microscope with congress working to end their public funding.  I am all for it!  If the far left wants to support Planned Parenthood, then they should put up their money and pay for it.  Why is Hollywood and the other intellectual elites not raising funds for them?  The answer is pretty evident.  They don’t want to be put into that position, the abortion issue must be kept off the front page.  The far left wants you the tax payer to fund the abortions of helpless babies under the false guise of planned parenthood which sounds nicer.  

President Obama’s record is already quite clear on abortion.  As a Senator from Ill. he voted to support the most cruel and disgusting type of abortion.  Late term abortions where the infant is fully developed but aborted by a doctor inserting a vacuum nozzle into the infants skull!  I pray most Americans are outraged over that type of evil being practiced behind closed doors.  That evil is compounded by public financing.  This will continue to be an issue (or should be) leading up to the 2012 election.  Just remember Obama’s position on the issue and know he will veto any bill that unfunds Planned Parenthood!